This concept try assessed by the around three activities playing with an excellent eight-area Likert-sorts of measure calculating this new extent to which the players noticed it was basically effective at having fun with an effective condom. 1) “How more than likely will it be to work with an excellent condom?” (from one- Unlikely anyway to 7- More than likely); 2) “Just how difficult is it to utilize a good condom?” (in one- Easy at all in order to 7- Quite difficult); and you https://datingmentor.org/tr/naughtydate-inceleme/ can 3) “I’m with the capacity of playing with good condom” (in one- Unable after all to seven- Extremely in a position to). Internal surface wasn’t estimated for it level since it incorporated only about three items researching factors not related together.
Behavioral intent
Types of items are: “I will see condoms easily you prefer her or him,” “I’m able to play with an excellent condom easily have sex involving penetration,” (this person items was utilized into the mediation analyses) and you can “I am able to give the other person that we is fool around with a great condom in advance of penetration” (in the current data; ? = .73). The exact opposite, engaging in substandard intimate practices, was also analyzed: “I can make love immediately after taking an excessive amount of alcoholic beverages,” and you will “I am able to have sex immediately following taking almost every other medication (elizabeth.g., marihuana otherwise acidic)” (in today’s studies; ? = .73). New response scale try Likert-variety of which have four things: step one = Definitely not, dos = Most likely not, step three = Maybe, 4 = We is likely to, and 5 = We will. Individual items were chosen for the modern analysis.
Condom have fun with
I analyzed this new part of condom explore (“Delight county the fresh portion of times when make use of this coverage method in your sexual relationship”), that have a size regarding 0 in order to one hundred%. Centered on frequency regarding condom have fun with, we determined the latest variable from uniform entry to condom (step 1 = uniform play with: 100% of times; 0 = inconsistent explore: lower than one hundred%). Anyone product was utilized in the present analysis.
Concurrently, to help you analysis the fresh sexual connection with the players, different facets of the adolescents’ matchmaking situation and you will intimate conclusion and you may intimate positioning had been examined: 1) mate (“Could you actually have a partner?”) answers: yes or no; 2) ages of sexual mate (years); 3) Intimate sense (“Have you had sexual communication (oral, anal, otherwise vaginal sex, otherwise shared genital stimulation?”; answers: sure or no; 4) number of intimate lovers (“That have how many folks have you had sexual intercourse also penetration using your lifestyle?”); 5) which have participated in the after the four means analyzed truly: genital stimulation, mutual masturbation, dental gender, vaginal entrance, and you may rectal entrance, solutions sure or no; 6) decades when the sexual habit was initially tried (however, if this has been experimented with) in years; 7) regularity out-of sexual relationships, with solutions ranging from We have maybe not got intercourse to each and every time otherwise just about every time; 8) access to condom within the very first sex (I have not got intercourse, Zero, Sure, or I don’t remember); and you may 9) sexual orientation (Kinsey’s size); and you may 10) security methods (Is it possible you use the following the protection measures on the penetrative intercourse? In this case, delight mean how many times make use of this procedure away from safeguards on your sexual dating; options: condom, tablets, zero approach, or any other tips).
Statistical analyses
All the analyses was carried out having fun with SPSS v25 analytical app. The research hypotheses was checked with the chi-rectangular fact for the research regarding categorical details and you can Student’s t having decimal parameters. Intercourse variations in sociodemographic facts, condom explore precursors, and you will sexual choices have been reviewed. Size of impact try computed using potential ratio (OR) (to have categorical parameters) and Cohen’s d (to have decimal parameters). Cohen’s d opinions ? .20 have been felt tiny, beliefs anywhere between .21 and you will .49 we sensed brief, values anywhere between .fifty and .79 had been experienced typical, and viewpoints ? .80 was basically felt large . Reliability of your balances is determined using Cronbach leader. The benefits level try place at the ? = .05 (95% count on period).